Read Full Text: Sharpening our critical edge: Occupational therapy in the context of marginalized populations (Available for free through ProQuest with your NBCOT membership)
Journal: Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Year Published: 2015
Ranked 88th on our 2015-2020 list of the 100 most influential OT-related articles
As always, this week’s article comes from our list of the 100 most influential OT-related research articles from the past 5 years.
I will admit that I am approaching it differently than I would have 2 weeks ago—before George Floyd’s death further underscored the amount of work needed to dismantle the systems of racism and discrimination.
While I approached this article with gratitude for its importance, I have to confess: I was also left wanting more from it.
The article lays out how systemic injustice impacts individual and community health, and should thus influence our occupational therapy delivery. So, in this way, the topic could not be more important right now.
But, the article also isn’t perfect.
Even though it was only published 5 years ago, some of the language already feels dated. But, what really stood out to me is that it was written solely from a white, middle-class perspective. (The same as my own.)
That said, our goal is always that the research we present will encourage discussion. Ideally, the concepts in this article will also elicit some self-examination.
And, most importantly, I hope this article will drive us to action.
What were the main arguments of this paper?
This paper is an opinion piece and call-to-action, and it was written by an occupational therapist working in Canada. The author is calling on the profession to sharpen our critical thinking when it comes to working with marginalized populations. Her interest in this topic came from working with indigenous people.
She wants to challenge you and the profession in three ways:
- To rethink assumptions we make about individualism and choice.
- To use the concept of intersectionality to add more complexity to our current understanding of how discrimination works.
- To use critical reflexivity to rethink and address how we have historically positioned ourselves in relation to marginalized people.
Let’s start with the goal in mind: health equity.
Before diving into her calls for action, the author refreshed us on the concept of health equity.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has an official definition of health equity, which you can find here.
But, essentially, health equity means that everyone should have a fair opportunity to achieve their full health potential.
Obviously, we have not achieved health equity around the world.
But, as WHO points out, the biggest opportunities to address the current inequities in healthcare are through policy changes and by addressing social determinants of health.
As a reminder, social determinants of health are the conditions in which people live, work, and play. (These differ from clinical determinants of health, which include medical treatments and lifestyle choices.)
The Club recently discussed social determinants of health in this landmark OT study, which shed new light on the topic. In fact, the Canadian Medical Association estimates that social determinants of health account for 50% of health outcomes in the Canadian population!
The author points out that for the indegnious people of Canada, some social determinants of health have included:
- Patriarchal and colonial government relations
- Systemic racism and discrimination
- Economic and political marginalization
- Barriers to self determination
Basically, the argument she is making is that if we truly want to impact individual health, we can’t just pay attention to half of the puzzle. We have to address social determinants of health.
Here’s what she is calling on us to do:
Call-to-action #1: Rethink assumptions we make about individualism and choice.
In some ways, thinking about social determinants seems to perfectly complement occupational therapy—after all, thinking about the environment is our jam! (Right?!)
But, the reality is that our focus has tended to be on the immediate physical and social environments, rather than on the broader socioeconomic, historical, and political contexts.
Even though we know that health problems are, in large part, related to broader social determinants of health, we will often find ourselves promoting solutions that are primarily focused on individual choice.
And, honestly, that’s the best case scenario—one where we are simply ignoring unjust systems that lead to health inequities.
The worst-case scenario, and one we all need to personally confront, is that we might be actively contributing to oppressive systems.
As the author says:
“Imposing a particular view of occupation and daily life that is reflective of white, gendered, and middle class norms of occupational therapy risks that our interventions in the context of marginalized populations are experienced as oppressive and disempowering.”
Call-to-action #2: Use the concept of intersectionality to better understand how discrimination works.
The health inequities and discrimination that seem baked into our systems are sobering…and it can be hard to know what to do to make things better.
The author suggests we begin by adding more complexity and nuance to how we think and talk about marginalization.
One problem we experience in our work (and our world) is a tendency to group people into simple, fixed subgroups, such as “immigrant,” “indigenous person,” or “mentally ill.” We do this so we can make assumptions about them, without having to do the active work of getting to know their strengths and their struggles.
Intersectionality is a concept that helps us break out of this reductive thinking.
Scholars of of intersectional thinking argue that “gender, race, and class are not experienced as separate phenomena but as equally important, interlocking systems of inequalities, subordination, and domination that are shaped differently by women’s historical, geographical, and social contexts and their capacity for agency and resilience.”
Basically, intersectionality calls on us to take the time to listen to each person, because individuals are complex and many forces have intersected to create their unique circumstances. It also calls on us to be cognizant of individuals’ agency, resistance, and competence, instead of looking at them through a deficit lens.
Here’s one of cited authors from the paper, summing up intersectionality in a YouTube clip:
Call-to-action #3: Use critical reflexivity to rethink and address how we have historically positioned ourselves in relation to marginalized people.
This is where the article left me wanting a little more, because call-to-action #3 kind of feels like step one on our path to making change.
The author highlights the concept of critical reflexivity, which is slightly different from critical reflection. In fact, you might even consider it a precursor to self-reflection.
Critical reflexivity is when we “turn our gaze inward and question how we are individually located historically, politically, and socially in relation to our clients; the organizational contexts in which we work; and the broader society in which we live.”
Once we do this work, we can then begin to critically reflect on how we can be part of the needed deconstruction and reconstruction of systems to make our world more just.
The author sums up why we do this in the conclusion of her article:
“I believe we have a moral responsibility to do nothing less.”
Takeaways for OT practitioners:
1. We all have a lot of self-work to do to understand how we participate in unjust systems.
I’ve been truly humbled these past few weeks, realizing how much self-work I have to do when it comes to race. And how often I’ve been complicit with systems that serve people like me at the expense of others.
The self-work of understanding our own personal biases (and the biases of the systems in which we work) will be a lifelong process for all of us. If you’ve found any resources that you’ve found particularly helpful in your practice, please share them in the comments.
2. This self-work should lead to action.
The point of all of this self-work is to lead to action. Ideally, this action means not just changing the ways we talk and act, but also working to correct the systems that are unjust.
If you’ve been struggling with what to do as an OT professional, I recommend you explore organizations that are already spearheading this important work. Here in the United States, we are lucky to have The Coalition of Occupational Therapy Advocates for Diversity (COTAD).
One simple action step you could take today is to donate to them.
3. Please let us know which voices and research you think might improve the OT Potential Club (and the OT profession).
This article really underscored the fact that if we care about individual health, we also have to care deeply about community health. That means we need to address systemic issues like racism and injustice.
We plan to continue to do that in the Club. If you know of any important research related to these topics, please let us know! While we tend to work through our list of the 100 most influential OT-related journal articles, we work hard to integrate member requests whenever possible.
Here’s to learning and changing, together, as an occupational therapy community!
(Possibly) Earn CEUs/PDUs for reading this article.
Many of you can receive continuing education credits for reading this article. Here’s a form to help you do it, along with information to help you understand who qualifies.
And, here’s the full APA citation you many need:
Gerlach, A. J. (2015). Sharpening our critical edge: Occupational therapy in the context of marginalized populations. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(4), 245–253. doi: 10.1177/0008417415571730
Lastly, thank you to our guest co-moderator for the week!
I’m thrilled to welcome Lauren Jones (@lauren4) as a co-moderator of this week’s discussion! Lauren is the author of Gotta Be OT and serves on the Executive Board of the Coalition of Occupational Therapy Advocates for Diversity (COTAD).