Read Full Text: The prevalence of potentially modifiable functional deficits and the subsequent use of occupational and physical therapy by older adults with cancer
Journal: Journal of Geriatric Oncology (Impact Factor: 3.359)
Year Published: 2015
Ranked 39th on our 2014-2019 list of the 50 most influential articles
The first step to providing great OT care is getting the right referral at the right time.
But, like every step of therapy delivery, this can be a complex process.
There arenāt always clear physician guidelines that dictate screening for specific functional deficits. While we OTs might immediately recognize when a patient would benefit our services, a physician might not always think to refer out to OT.
In the Club, weāve already discussed the importance (and, in many cases, the complexities) of screening patients for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and cytomegalovirus (CMV). And, weāve unfortunately noted that the screening and referral process can be less than ideal.
This weekās article looks at functional deficits among older adults with cancerāand we see a similarly complex story: in the sample studied, 65% of older adults with cancer had at least one functional deficit that was identified as being potentially amenable by PT/OT.
65%! Thatās a significant number.
But the frustrating part is that only 9% received an OT/PT referral within 12 months of a noted deficit!
More salient points about this study for OTs to consider
This study included 529 patients. Researchers pulled patientsā data from a cancer cohort registry and linked it to their billing data; this enabled the researchers to determine patientsā functional deficits and check if they were subsequently referred to OT and/or PT.
The patients were all recruited from the University of North Carolina (UNC) Health Care oncology outpatient clinics, with the following eligibility criteria:
- Age 65 older
- Able to consent to complete a geriatric assessment
- Demonstrates English writing and reading proficiency
The study found that the chances of having potentially modifiable functional deficits were higher for certain patients. These included:
- Older patients (with increased age, thereās increased risk of functional deficits)
- Those with comorbid conditions
- And those with less than a college degree
Most importantly, though, the numbers I mentioned in the intro suggested a major underutilization of OT/PT services for these patients.
I think the article summarizes the importance of this study quite nicely:
āThe results outline the great need for intervention and referrals to OT/PT in this population. Early identification of OT/PT related functional deficits with the geriatric assessment may lead to increased referral to OT/PT and potentially decreased disability and cost.ā
Takeaways for OT practitioners
(These are my personal takeaways, and were not mentioned in the article.)
A large percentage of older adults with cancer may not be receiving the rehab they may need
This is one of those studies that seems to back up something I see happening in my own community. For whatever reason, many older adults with cancer are left to struggle with functional deficits, without the support of rehab. This is very unfortunate, as OT/PT could likely help many of these folks immensely in their daily lives.
In this article, the authors mentioned another study that had similar findings. The results pulled at my heartstrings.
A large cross-sectional study of 2,200 adults with cancer were asked about their perceived need for rehabilitation and 39% felt they did not receive the care they needed.
The solution to this problem seems to be as simple (but also utterly complex) as improving communication between non-rehab medical providers and therapists.
And this leads to my second takeawayā¦
As OTs, we need to be asking ourselves: how can we better communicate our value to other healthcare providers?
I thought this line from the study was really powerful:
āClinicians who could potentially refer to OT/PT report a general lack of understanding of the services, a perception that rehabilitation is inappropriate for adults with cancer and overall difficulty with knowing when to refer and to whom.ā (page 7)
This backs up what I have seen anecdotally in my own practice.
Iām eager for you all to share and discuss some successful ways you communicate with other practitioners regarding how OT can help patients with cancerāand any patient population, for that matter.
Effective communication is already a challenge in our hectic and fragmented healthcare systemāand it is only going to become more so as exponential amounts of healthcare- and rehab-related research is being conducted.
Iāll go ahead and start the conversation.
I had the most success with referrals when I did a āLunch and Learnā with our physicians and, now that I have a better grasp of new research coming out each year, I would definitely want to do at the very least a yearly touch-point with our local physiciansābut Iām not sure which methods would be the most effective.
Iām excited to hear your thoughts!
Listen to my takeaways in podcast form:
Find other platforms for listening to the OT Potential Podcast here.
(Possibly) Earn CEUs/PDUs for reading this article
Many of you can receive continuing education credits for reading this article. Hereās a form to help you do it, along with information to help you understand who qualifies.
And, hereās the full APA citation you many need:
Pergolotti, M., Deal, A. M., Lavery, J., Reeve, B. B., & Muss, H. B. (2015). The prevalence of potentially modifiable functional deficits and the subsequent use of occupational and physical therapy by older adults with cancer. Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 6(3), 194ā201. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2015.01.004