Read Full Text: Cancer rehabilitation and palliative care: critical components in the delivery of high-quality oncology services (Free to access)
Journal: Supportive Care in Cancer
Year Published: 2015
Ranked 22nd on our 2015-2020 list of the 100 most influential OT-related articles
Isn’t it nice when really smart people sit down to explain the value of OT on our behalf?
This special report outlines the role of occupational therapy in cancer care, and it explains how OTs work alongside other rehab professionals and palliative care teams.
The author’s arguments may push you to think more broadly about the services you could potentially provide to patients with cancer. This paper might also serve as a shared resource to get your whole team on the same page with how to provide high-quality oncology services.
Let’s dive in.
The current problem: rehab and palliative care are underutilized in the cancer population
The majority of cancer patients (and survivors) would benefit from rehab and palliative care—but the underutilization of these services is well documented.
In fact, in the Club, we’ve already looked at research that highlighted the underutilization of OT in a specific hospital system.
The reasons for this underutilization are complex.
But, in order to provide patients with the care they deserve, we need to start with the basics: we must encourage healthcare professionals to better understand the roles of both rehab and palliative care in managing the effects of cancer. (Ideally, this will lead to more professionals recommending rehab and palliative care early in the course of oncology care.)
Which is where this paper comes in…
What was the intent behind this report?
Due to the underutilization of these valuable cancer care services, the authors sought to:
- Define cancer rehab and palliative care
- Explain these services’ roles in care delivery
- Highlight how these services can be critical to providing high-quality oncology care
How are cancer rehab and palliative care similar?
Let’s start by emphasizing how cancer rehab and palliative care are similar. (I know we like to focus on the distinct value of OT in the Club—but when it comes to a team approach, understanding our shared mission and values is essential.)
Cancer rehab and palliative care share a common clinical philosophy and approach, including:
- Using an interdisciplinary model of care
- Seeking to improve patients’ function
- Developing treatment plans that are patient- and family-centric
- Taking into account medical, physical, social, and psychological components
- Valuing shared decision-making
- Improving healthcare efficiency (and decreasing costs!) by reducing the duration of hospital visits and preventing unanticipated readmissions
Considering the gravity of the list above, it’s not surprising that there are set policies and procedures for referring patients to rehab and palliative care. (You can find American College of Surgeons’ Standards for Optimal Cancer Care here.)
Ok. Next let’s look at the unique value of cancer rehab, and then we’ll move on to palliative care:
Fostering a better understanding of cancer rehab
Let me preface this section by acknowledging that too many people (including fellow healthcare professionals) are confused about the role of rehab in cancer care.
In fact, the authors specifically mentioned the tendency of people to confuse rehab with exercise programs. They also mentioned a concerning trend of oncologists adopting a “cardiac rehab” approach to cancer care, where doctors tend to focus on one bodily system or impairment. Any therapist would immediately recognize the flaw in not considering the multiple co-occurring impairments cancer patients often experience.
Patients with cancer can present with complex profiles, including many functional impairments, which can be overwhelming for oncologists to navigate alone. That’s why it’s so critical they turn to the expertise of rehab professionals, who are accustomed to treating complex diagnoses.
The article goes on to specify two areas of cancer rehab:
Prehabilitation:
Prehabilitation is the cancer rehab that occurs between the time of diagnosis and the beginning of acute treatment. It includes physical and psychological assessments in order to:
- Establish a baseline level of function
- Identify impairments
- Provide targeted interventions that promote physical and psychological health, in order to reduce the incidence and/or or severity of treatment-related impairments
Impairment-driven cancer rehab:
This is the phase of rehab with which we are probably most familiar. The article cited “Impairment-driven cancer rehab: an essential component of of quality care survivorship” as a resource related to this topic. OTs and other rehab professionals can help address some of the following impairments experienced by patients with cancer:
- Fatigue
- Pain
- Weakness/asthenia/cachexia
- Dyspnea
- Delirium
- Anxiety
- Depression
- Cognitive decline
- Peripheral neuropathies
- Plexopathies
- Myopathies
- Radiation fibrosis
Fostering an understanding of palliative care
As you probably know, palliative care is focused on providing relief from the symptoms, pain, and stress caused by serious illness.
Unfortunately, palliative care has become primarily associated with end-of-life care. And, it’s often viewed as something to try only when rehab and other interventions are no longer effective.
But, this is simply not the case.
Palliative care is appropriate at many stages of disease—and should be provided in conjunction with interventions (like rehab) that are intended to cure or halt progression.
So, how do we move into this new era of closer collaboration?
Step one of closer collaboration between rehab, palliative care, and the entire cancer care team seems to be education; we should simply seek to understand each profession’s shared values and distinct contributions to care.
The goal is to move into a phase the authors call “collaborative interdisciplinary care”—where the teams work together within their own respective specialties to address cancer-related issues.
The authors also stressed the importance of patient-centered outcome measures. They highlighted the report “Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life,” which emphasized that end-of-life care continues to be characterized by fragmented care and unmet needs.
(Honestly, I do not need to look beyond my own social circle to confirm this is still the case.)
What screens are appropriate for referral to rehab and palliative care?
The authors’ last step toward increased collaboration was access to rehab and palliative care. Performing regular screens throughout the continuum of care is one way to promote more timely referrals. While there is not one universally recognized screen, I’m going to list the currently available screens, because many of them can be used in your assessment, as well:
- Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13)
- Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)
- Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living (BI)
- Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
- Karnofsky Performance Scale
- Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
- 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog)
- Mini-Cog©
- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G)
- Functional Living Index: Cancer (FLIC)
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
- Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS)
What did the authors conclude/discuss?
I love how the authors summed it up:
“With the challenging goals of simultaneously lowering healthcare costs while improving patient outcomes and satisfaction with care, there is an urgent need to address under-utilization of both cancer rehabilitation and palliative care services, as well as improve access."
Takeaways for OT practitioners
(These are my personal takeaways, and were not mentioned in the article.)
1. You play a unique and extremely important role on the cancer care team.
One of the barriers to rehab collaboration in care was simply lack of perceived experience with medically complex patients. I have personally felt this as a practitioner. But, one thing this article drove home for me was how important it is to have these patients on our caseloads—not because we have all of the answers, but because as a team member we bring a needed and valuable approach to care.
2. Maybe we need to be more intentional about forming relationships with our local cancer care centers?
For some reason, when I thought of health professionals in my community with whom to reach out to and build relationships, I never thought to reach out to our local cancer care center. I think I thought of their care as too specialized and stand-alone, and I guess I assumed that they didn’t need contact with a general OT. In retrospect, these are exactly the kinds of relationships we need to be building.
3. And, finally, “pre-habilitation” seems like a very important research trend for us to follow.
Even though the section on pre-habilitaiton was pretty short in this article, it seemed like a really important opportunity for us to consider. Cancer care has such a unique timeline, where there is usually a “window of opportunity” between diagnosis and beginning acute treatment. This timeframe seems optimal for beginning therapy to set the stage for patients to receive responsive and timely care. I’ll be curious to hear if anyone has any experience with this!
Here’s the full APA citation for this article:
Silver, J. K., Raj, V. S., Fu, J. B., Wisotzky, E. M., Smith, S. R., & Kirch, R. A. (2015). Cancer rehabilitation and palliative care: Critical components in the delivery of high-quality oncology services. Supportive Care in Cancer, 23 (12), 3633-3643. doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2916-1