Read Full Text: Telehealth in occupational therapy: An AOTA Position Paper (Available via NBCOT and ProQuest)
Journal: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Year Published: 2018
This week’s article was chosen in response to the coronavirus pandemic.
The world has changed drastically in a week’s time—and we are being asked to change with it.
I know this has meant long, exhausting days. And, that we have been left scrambling trying to figure out what a “new normal” will look like in the weeks ahead.
For many of you, telehealth will be part of this new normal. This is why I wanted to spend this week discussing AOTA’s Position Paper on Telehealth with you.
No matter how quickly the world changes, I believe that, together, we can stay grounded in our mission: to provide the best possible care to our patients.
Understanding the language around telehealth
Per this paper, “telehealth” is the recommended term for when OT professionals provide services by way of information and communication technology.
That being said, telehealth is technically a very broad term—and it is helpful to know some more specific language to understand all of the ways telehealth can manifest.
In the next section, I’ll break down the different types of telehealth. I will also link to the articles that the Position Paper highlights.
(I’m using way more links than usual because I want you to be able to find the study that correlates most closely to the care you are seeking to provide.)
In what situations has telehealth been studied?
Telerehabilitation: This is a phrase used to describe the delivery of rehabilitation or habilitation by way of information and communication technology. Telerehabilitation is a branch of telehealth that would encompass all of the other terms we are about to look at.
Tele-evaluation: Evaluation through information and communication technology
- Cognitive screening
- Orthopedic (hand) assessment
- Lymphedema assessment
- Wheelchair prescription
- Home assessment
- Ergonomic assessment
- Tele-Ergonomics (2012)
Tele-intervention: The provision of interventions that are preventative, habilitative, or rehabilitative in nature via information and communication technology. Of course, this is the section that we want to know most about. But, unfortunately, little guidance was given in the paper.
Tele-consultation: Tele-consultation is a term that describes virtual consultation, which may or may not have the client present, and may involve some combination of the following parties: a local provider, a remote provider, a durable medical equipment vendor, prosthetist, physician, and/or caregiver.
It seems to me that the line between intervention and consultation may be vague. And, some of the studies linked below may be helpful in guiding intervention as well as consultation.
Here are the types of tele-consultation the position paper highlighted. You can click through to see the associated study mentioned in the article.
- Home safety and home modification evaluations
- Prevention and wellness services
- Ergonomic consultation
- Preadmission consultation for patients undergoing total hip and total knee replacements
- Support groups for people with chronic conditions
- Complex pediatric feeding disorders
- Facilitation of coordination and motor control in children with cerebral palsy
- Support of school-based services for children with complex medical needs
- Occupation-based coaching for caregivers of young children with autism
Telemonitoring/remote patient monitoring:
Ok, first of all, I want to ask if anyone has any updates on reimbursement for remote patient monitoring. Lauren and I wrote this article which laid out our knowledge of the reimbursement situation, but it was over a year ago.
Telemonitoring is commonly used in the medical model for chronic disease management. Typically, patients’ vital signs and other health data (e.g. ADL performance, fall events) are sent to a clinician for review to ensure timely monitoring takes place.
Studies looking at how occupational therapy practitioners have used telemonitoring have looked at:
- Adherence to an intervention program for patients with COPD
- Monitoring ADL status of the elderly
- Screening cognition in people with Parkinson’s Disease
What assessments should we be using?
As therapists make the quick transition to telehealth coverage, sound clinical reasoning will keep playing a role in determining which assessments are appropriate.
Below are the assessments (as of 2018) that were studied and found to be reliable when administered through telehealth:
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
- Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
- The Functional Reach Test
- European Stroke Scale
- The Kohlman Evaluation of Living Skills
- Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
- Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
- Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
- Jamar Dynamometer
- Preston Pinch Gauge
- 9-Hole Peg Test
- Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)
- The Ergonomic Assessment Tool for Arthritis
Personal gripe: I’m really confused why no pediatric assessments were mentioned in this paper, given that most teletherapy I’ve heard of anecdotally has been delivered in pediatric or school-based settings. Next week, we will be sure to look at a study that highlights teletherapy in pediatrics.
What do you need to know about supervision and telehealth?
When it comes to supervision of students and COTAs, the guidelines that dictate your normal practice should remain in place when delivering telehealth services. You will need to reference your state licensure laws if you are uncertain about these guidelines.
What are ethical considerations?
Right now, a common feeling among OT practitioners is that we are having to weigh ethical concerns as we navigate a very fine line. This line becomes increasingly fuzzy as we consider the need to deliver care to our patients—and whether doing so will jeopardize the safety of patients and ourselves.
The position paper highlights that occupational therapy practitioners are, of course, still called to adhere to our code of ethics.
The position paper also directs readers to the American Telemedicine Association’s “Principles in Delivering Telerehabilitation Services.”
The document outlines administrative, clinical, and technical principles, as well as the ethical principles which I am listing below:
- Organizations and professionals shall incorporate organizational values and ethics into policy and procedures related to telerehabilitation.
- Organizations and professionals shall be aware of and comply with any applicable laws, regulations, statutes, and/or telerehabilitation-related policies and adhere to professional codes of ethics.
- Organizations and/or professionals shall inform clients of their rights and responsibilities when receiving rehabilitation and habilitation services through telerehabilitation, including their right to refuse or discontinue services.
- Organizations and professionals should have in place a formal process for resolving ethical issues as well as policies that identify, eliminate, and reduce conflict of interest associated with the provision of telerehabilitation services.
Takeaways for OT practitioners
(These are my personal takeaways, and were not mentioned in the article.)
1. When it comes to adopting telehealth, COVID-19 may be speeding the inevitable
From everything I’ve read this week, it seems that the consistent prediction was that telehealth was going to eventually become a major component of therapy delivery, but that the biggest barrier was legislation that was moving far more slowly than the rapidly advancing technology solutions.
But, in just one week, we have seen many of the legislative barriers across the country begin to crumble. Now, it seems like our main focus needs to be ensuring that the reimbursement we receive reflects the value we are able to provide!
2. Of course, we always wish there was more research out there—but, honestly, there is more out there than I expected to find.
Just from looking at evidence each week, we already know that we rarely find perfect answers in research.
But, we all see that research often provides a helpful jumping off point for your clinical reasoning. And, this seems to be the case in telehealth. I was pleasantly surprised by the number of articles cited in this position paper.
My goal over this week is to gather the resources found in this paper, as well as others, into a helpful telehealth research resource page for you.
3. There are SO MANY details to flesh out…that’s why we have a forum.
Of course, you may finish reading the position paper and find yourself with even more questions than before. I have been more thankful this week than ever for our forums, where we can dive deep into specifics. But, I also just appreciate the community we have built, where we can share stories and encourage each other. I will be really curious to hear where you are with telehealth. This is a unique time because we have several active threads going, so please weigh in below with reactions to this paper and general questions about best practices in the comments below.
Or, check out one of our associated threads:
Listen to my takeaways in podcast form:
Find platforms for listening to the OT Potential Podcast here.
(Possibly) Earn CEUs/PDUs for reading this article.
Many of you can receive continuing education credits for reading this article. Here’s a form to help you do it, along with information to help you understand who qualifies.
And, here’s the full APA citation you many need:
Cason, Jana, DHS,O.T.R./L.F., A.O.T.A., Hartmann, Kim, PhD,O.T.R./L., F.A.O.T.A., Jacobs, Karen, EdD, CPE,O.T.R./L., F.A.O.T.A., & Richmond, Tammy, MS,O.T.R./L., F.A.O.T.A. (2018). Telehealth in occupational therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72, 1-18. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2193509193?accountid=143111