Quantitative Evaluation System of Soft Neurological Signs for Children with ADHD

Read Full Text: Quantitative Evaluation System of Soft Neurological Signs for Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (Free to access)
Journal: Sensors (Impact Factor 3.031)
Year Published: 2016

Neurological soft signs are a hot topic in OT right now, and I can see why…they are fascinating. And, they confirm what seasoned OT professionals have seen over the years: there is often more going on with our patients, at a biological level, than is readily apparent.

If the term “neurological soft signs” is new to you, no worries. I’m sure your experience and education have taught you more about them than you might imagine.

This week’s article focuses on a specific soft neurological sign, slowed pronation/supination in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The article gives you a window into where the research is at with soft neurological signs—as well as their potential future clinical applications.

(Please note that this article topic is a special request from a Club member—and it does not appear on our 100 most influential articles list, which we will return to next week.)

Quick overview of soft neurological signs (SNS)

“Neurological soft signs,” or “soft neurological signs” (SNS), are observable motor and sensory conditions that cannot be linked to specific brain lesions. (Think: associated movements, involuntary movements, slowed motor skills, etc.)

These soft signs are things we have been noticing in patients for decades—particularly in specific patient populations—but improved brain tracking and standardized assessments are rapidly expanding how we think of them clinically.

I want to clarify that many of these neurological signs are present in infants and young children, but they eventually disappear (or “integrate”) over time. They only become abnormal when they persist longer than they should.

I also want to highlight that the lists I saw of what soft signs could entail varied. Part of this might be the fact that there appears to be a gray area between “soft” and “hard” neurological signs.

Here are examples of soft neurological signs that I found in this article and this article:

  • Finger-to-nose
  • Finger opposition
  • Visual pursuits
  • Heel-toe walking
  • Pronation and supination
  • Associated movements
  • Involuntary movements (like choreiform movements)
  • Dysrhythmia
  • Dysmetria
  • Intention tremor

Certain conditions where SNS are found are currently being researched, including:

  • Schizophrenia (This is where some of the most prominent research has been done)
  • Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
  • Autism spectrum disorder (ASD)
  • Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)
  • Bipolar disorder
  • First episode of psychosis

Finally, I think it is super important to mention that the exact origins of SNS are currently unknown, but what authors seem to be suggesting is that they may be caused by a difficulty in integrating the sensory and motor systems. Others have hypothesized that maybe there is some neural circuitry in the subcortical areas of the brain that are being impacted. But, the bottom line is that we simply don’t know their origins.

Why neurological soft signs are important

The development of motor and sensory skills is extremely complex and requires coordination of many parts of the brain. Hence, a delay or impairment in any of these skills can be one of the first indicators that something is developmentally atypical.

It could be the “canary in the coal mine,” so to speak.

For example, motor deficits can be among the earliest and most prominent symptoms of ASD—and they frequently precede core social and communicative symptoms.

Hence, if we can get a better understanding of these early soft signs, it may make a huge difference in early detection and treatment.

ADHD and soft neurological signs

Ok, finally onto the specifics of the article:

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is typically evaluated by a psychologist by doing the following:

  • Reviewing prenatal and perinatal development
  • Taking a thorough family history
  • Completing a physical and neurological examination using visual inspection of soft neurological signs (SNS). (This often does not use a quantitative method as it uses visual observation and that can be biased.)

The researchers wanted to see if there was a way to better quantify SNS in ADHD beyond the typical visual observation.

How the researchers quantified SNS of pronation/supination

The researchers decided to examine the SNS of pronation and supination response time by using a wireless computer system. The idea was that the system could evaluate more precisely whether this specific SNS in children with ADHD would present differently compared to their typically developing peers.

Researchers used wireless acceleration and angular velocity sensors (which look similar to e-stim pads) placed on both triceps and the tops of both hands. The sensors tracked the children’s movements via bluetooth while the children mimicked guided movements on the computer screen.

The Results

In a nutshell, here were the results:

Spanning from ages 8-11 years old, there were significant differences found in rotation speed, mirror movements, bimanual symmetry, temporal change (or pauses), and compliance with matching the images on the screen. These results indicated that the SNS of motor coordination for pronation and supination function tend to develop several years later in children with ADHD, compared to their typically developing peers.

Further reading:

If this information is relevant to your practice, I highly recommend the 2018 article Scientific Evidence for the Evaluation of Neurological Soft Signs as Atypical Neurodevelopment Markers in Childhood Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Reading it informed much of my thinking on the article, but it is, unfortunately not free to access at this point.

Takeaways for OT practitioners

(These are my personal takeaways, and were not mentioned in the article.)

Neurological soft signs are fascinating—and it’s important for therapists to be aware of them.

As I mentioned before, I think all OTs should have a general awareness of neurological soft signs.

For me, reading about them served as an important reminder that there is so much going on at a biological level that we have yet to understand—not to mention, the fact that our systems are interconnected in ways we are still grasping to understand.

NSS may play an important role in screening, but more research and guidelines are needed.

Screening is a complex topic. I refer you back to our conversation on universal screening for Autism, to get a sense of the complexity.

Basically, you want to be using the best assessments, and not cause unnecessary panic and alarm. Everything I read about NSS indicated that research, although promising, is still in the early stages. No concrete recommendations were given for the use of SNS in screening.

So, it does not seem appropriate to incorporate them as a standard screen, if no neurologic impairment is suspected—at least not at this time.

However, if a certain neurological sign is getting suddenly worse or is especially prominent, it definitely seems important to quantify it to the best of your ability and make an appropriate referral.

I did not see any indicators in research that we should be specifically addressing soft neurological signs in hopes that the intervention would have a broader impact on the condition.

Of course, the question begs itself, if we see something like retained reflexes or delayed motor skills, should we be directly addressing this SNS in our care?

This very topic came up in my supplementary reading on SNS, and I thought it was an important to highlight. I will relay to you the AOTA advice on this, which was found in this 2019 CE article:

Occupational therapists should distinguish between correlation and causality in considering intervention strategies to address learning and behavior problems. The fact that soft signs (such as retained reflexes or poor lateral dominance) are associated with attention and learning problems does not imply they are the cause of these impairments. Intervention approaches claiming to change the brain by establishing lateral dominance, or “integrating” residual reflexes, have little supportive evidence in the scientific literature. Signs are sequelae of brain dysfunction—not causes of it. (pg. 6.)

Listen to my takeaways in podcast form:

Find other platforms for listening to the OT Potential Podcast here.

(Possibly) Earn CEUs/PDUs for reading this article

Many of you can receive continuing education credits for reading this article. Here’s a form to help you do it, along with information to help you understand who qualifies.

And, here’s the full APA citation you many need:

Kaneko, M., Yamashita, Y., & Iramina, K. (2016). Quantitative evaluation system of soft neurological signs for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Sensors, 16(1), 116.

What questions/thoughts does this article raise for you?

1 Like

It is an interesting article and honestly something I have not thought much about, especially working mostly with adults. Research to back this up seems so far off to be considered ‘scientific’ or be reliably included in practice considering so many different diagnoses, ages, and environmental factors.
Still, it is interesting to consider and quantify ‘soft signs’ that we may see everyday, especially if they can assist in accurate diagnoses and/ therapy in the future.

5 Likes

This article was great- it did make me wonder more about neuroplasticity and whether if we are able to identify something like ADHD in a 2 year old via testing or a standard group of soft signs and initiate treatment, would the long term outcome look less like ADHD because of we are actually making changes in the brain?

5 Likes

Interesting article. I was surprised there was no mention of the QNST. I have completed this screening tool for some kindergartners who do not have an official diagnosis to look for neuro soft signs. The screening tool includes actions very similar to those mentioned in the article. I found that many of my students who would seem like they could be considered for ADHD did in fact score at risk for many NSS. My challenge was what to do with the information I gained from the QNST… I choose to use it for treatment and intervention planning purposes. I felt like it really gave me some valuable information! Thank you for sharing this article, it was a great read!

8 Likes

It will be interesting in the future to see if research will be able to show if certain ranges or presence of this SNS can determine what type of ADHD the child will have and how their presence of SNS can guide and individualize therapy protocols for children with ADHD.

2 Likes

Hi @tricia! This is a great point and reflects exactly what I was reading in the research. In fact, the discussion of this article concluded with these thoughts:

“NSS assessment could be used to identify subjects at risk, which might facilitate early treatment and potentially lead to a better outcome. In fact, research shows that the structure and connectivity of the brain are particularly “open to change” during early childhood. Early intervention can also provide stimulation for the development of efficient neuronal circuits, which are possibly less robust in those at risk to develop neuropsychiatric disorders and have been associated with normalized patterns of brain activity.”

2 Likes

Hi @Pollywallace! I’m super glad you brought up the standardized assessments that are out there! I wanted to include them in my review, but honestly, it review just got too long - and like you said they werent actually mentioned in the article.

The 2018 AOTA CE article does mention several assessments, including:

  1. The Quick Neurological Screening Test-3R
  2. The revised version of the Physical and Neurological Examination of Soft Signs
  3. The Clinical Observations of Motor and Postural Skills
  4. Observations Based on Sensory Integration Theory
  5. Structured Observations of Sensory Integration-Motor

I think you hit the nail on the head with the above quote! We are rapidly getting better at identifying soft signs, but on of the challenges is what to do with information once we have it :-). Again, I think the AOTA CE article does a good job of explaining how this information can give us helpful insights when paired with information on functional deficits, and how soft signs may be contributing to functional difficulties.

I also thought soft signs may be a concrete way of showing and explaining to parents how multiple systems are often impacted by many of these neurodevelopmental conditions.

But, overall, I will be curious to see new information come out on how they could impact our actual treatments.

4 Likes

I often use the QNST as one of my initial assessments as it can give me a good idea of why a child might be struggling in a classroom e.g. if they have poor auditory memory or poor spatial awareness a classroom can be challenging, and strategies can be implemented to help with these things. It also gives me a good idea of where a child is developmentally e.g. have they achieved laterality? I used this tool as part of a research project and it was very valuable.

5 Likes

@Pollywallace I think this has been a challenge for me as well. I will screen these soft signs during evaluation and notice they are present in a kid but then say “now what”. I’ve found that linking them to specific functional deficits has helped me utilize that information.

For example, if a kid with ADHD is unable to participate in a leisure activity of karate and during the evaluation I remember that they were unable to copy my actions on a pronation/supination test and track visual pursuits, then I might switch how I choose providing cues to teach a new motor sequence. I would focus on using tactile input and not moving too much while demonstrating. I think it just provides more information into how to make the kids successful for their daily activities and learn more about why they might have a harder time with a certain functional task.

4 Likes

I agree, Katie. My biggest reservation has been how to share the info with parents. I have shared the areas identified as challenges instead of calling them neuro soft signs…I think that verbiage can be a bit scary for parents.

3 Likes

What a very interesting article. As I was reading I can’t help but thinking back to the importance of us screening for the non-integrated reflexes. During my fieldwork this was something that I noticed a lot with my kiddos, especially those who were diagnosed with ADHD. I think it’s a newer topic but again something that my help us as OT’s to just be aware of and know that they are out there. We often use that OT lens so much that adding this type of information can assist us in really understanding and assisting those who may be struggling. I’ll be interested in seeing where the research continues to go within this area.

2 Likes

Such a fascinating article. I’m glad that it was suggested and thank you for including the link to the CEU form. I plan on reading through the complementary articles you included as well this evening when I have another moment.

I may add more to this comment later, but I wanted to include a few links right away. Soft Neurological Signs, especially for kids with ASD and ADHD, have been a topic of interest for me since 2016 when I listened to this episode of ABC’s All in the Mind: Apps for Autism. It highlights the research of Dr. Gail Alvares into using computer applications and video games in the early identification, diagnosis and treatment of kids with ASD. The effectiveness of these apps is driven in part by the SNS of kids with Autism.

Here is a link to Dr. Alvares’ site where you can access her work: Dr. Gail Alvares

The articles that I found the most interesting explore the relationship of early motor milestones and repetitive/restricted behaviors in kids with ASD and very early identification of neurodevelopmental disorders using a trans-disciplinary diagnostic approach.

Happy to be back on the OTPC! I was on hiatus to get married :smiley:

3 Likes

:tada: :tada: :tada: Ahhhhh! Hearty congrats, @maggie!!! You have one incredibly lucky spouse!!! :slight_smile: Now, I just need to get used to your new last name! :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Such an interesting avenue for further research. I appreciate that these are things that OT are trained, not just to notice, but to document in our observations including these kind of signs. An area to keep watching, as many have already said as these become increasingly quantifiable.

1 Like

Now if we could only find a way to show how OT can be a part of the early intervention and show changes and help the first line of healthcare (Pediatricians) refer appropriately. It’s a constant frustration for parents to be told to wait and see.

1 Like

It was so interesting to read this article, and to learn that this is one thing that OTs should really be aware of! The more knowledgeable we are about neurological soft signs, the more we are able to understand the functions of the human body. I recently came across an article written by the International Archives of Integrated Medicine that researched neurological soft signs in first episode psychotic disorders, and they concluded that it is very possible that it could be a biological marker for schizophrenia. OTs have the opportunity to identify these things and bring them into the light to ensure that proper treatment is provided for these patients. Thank you for sharing this article!

Respectfully,
Rebecca Allen OTAS

1 Like