Listen: Apple | Spotify | YouTube
Full Course Details: Public course page
Learn more about our guest: Ganesh M. Babulal, PhD, OTD, MSCI, MOT
The population of the United States is older than it has ever been.
And, by 2050 the older adult population (>65 years) is projected to increase another 47% (from 58 million in 2022 to 82 million by 2050). This will transform many aspects of our society—and one change we need to prepare for is:
The safety of older drivers.
Because by 2050 the older adult population (>65 years) will make up 25% of all drivers.
You may be aware that our youngest, newly licensed drivers are the most likely to be in a crash— but it is older drivers who are more likely to be in a fatal crash.
In our featured article from JAMA gives a high-level overview of the complex driving needs of an older population—and tucked inside you’ll see OT’s role in helping to address these needs.
After we review the article, we’ll welcome one of the article’s authors Ganesh M. Babulal, PhD, OTD, MSCI, MOT, who leads the DRIVES Project at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. Through this project he is working to understand how preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) impacts driving behavior.
Agenda
Intro and breakdown and analysis of journal article
- Introduction to Safety and Older Drivers
- Medical Impairment
- Fitness to Drive and Driving Cessation
- Available Safety Technologies
- The Impact of Autonomous Vehicles
Discussion on practical implications for OTs
- How did you become interested in OT and driving?
- How did this paper in JAMA come to be?
- As you revisit this paper, what stands out to you? And, has your thinking changed on anything?
- What are you learning from your tracking research? Are there driving safety screens that are accessible to the OT professional?
- What considerations do you think an OT should have when they are performing a full driving evaluation?
- Are there driving simulations that are accessible to the average clinician?
- What recommendations do you have for having conversations about driving cessation? (And how can we learn our state’s reporting laws?)
- What suggestions could OTs provide to improve driving safety, post eval?
- Are autonomous vehicles going to solve the problems of driver safety for us?
- What future business models/legislation do you think we need to make OT services for driving more accessible?
Supplemental Resources
Information about increase in traffic deaths
- 2024 Progress Report on National Roadway Safety Strategy (US Dept. of Transportation)
- The Rise in US Traffic Deaths– NY Times
Duty to warn regulation about unsafe drivers
Driving Risk/Fitness to Drive Screens
- Self Report Driver Safety Checklist
- Fitness-to-Drive Screening Measure Online– Short-Form (21-item) Version
- Free online driving simulator
OT’s Role in Driver Safety
- Car-fit Program
- OTs Role in Driving Rehab– AOTA
- FREE GRID Generalist Resource to Integrate Driving
- OTs Role with Driving
- OT-DORA: Occupational Therapy Driver Off-Road Assessment Battery
- OT-DORA versus GRID- Podcast
Driver Cessation
- Car Free Me- Program for Cessation
- A Systematic Review of Effective Interventions and Strategies to Support the Transition of Older Adults From Driving to Driving Retirement/Cessation
- The 3 Rs to Support Driving Retirement (Video by Susie the Driving OT)
More Supporting Journal Articles
- Predicting driving cessation among cognitively normal older drivers.
- Navigational decision‐making among older drivers: An analysis of real‐world driving patterns.
Article Review
Read Full Text: Addressing the complex driving needs of an aging population (This is a paid article, but we still thought it was important to cover.)
Journal: JAMA
Year Published: 2023
The U.S. population is older than it has ever been.
And, the older adult population (>65 years) in the United States is projected to grow another 47% by 2050—up to 82 million compared to 58 million in 2022. This will transform many aspects of our society, but one change we definitely need to prepare for is:
The safety of older drivers.
Because by 2050, 25% of all drivers will be over the age of 65.
While it’s true that younger, newly licensed drivers are the most likely to be involved in a crash, older drivers are more likely to be in a fatal crash.
Today’s featured article from JAMA provides a high-level overview of the complex driving needs of an older population—and gives a glimpse into OT’s role in addressing these needs.
Next week on the podcast, we’ll welcome Ganesh M. Babulal, PhD, OTD, MSCI, MOT, one of the article’s authors and the leader of the DRIVES Project at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. Through this project, Dr. Babulal is working to understand how preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) impacts driving behavior.
Let’s dive in…
About this article
This article is from the JAMA Insights series, which aims to highlight issues of high clinical relevance in a concise way. JAMA is among the top 5 journals in medicine and science. The full article is a relatively quick read, so I encourage you to check it out—but here’s a summary of the most important takeaways for OTs:
Intro to safety and older drivers
Older adults can experience a decline in visual, cognitive, and motor functions. These age-related changes can work in combination to adversely impact driving skills (for example, by causing delayed reaction time). As we’ll cover in the next section, these changes often occur in conjunction with chronic diseases.
These aging factors may explain why older adults have the highest rate of death associated with driving.
Compared with younger drivers:
- Drivers ages 75–79 are at a 2.5x higher risk of a crash death.
- Drivers over the age of 80 are at a 5x higher risk of a crash death.
Medical impairment
Numerous age-associated conditions increase the risk of driving impairment for older adults. For example, neurological conditions can lead to dementia impairments that cause drivers to:
- Confuse the break and gas pedals.
- Fail to locate familiar routes.
- Not observe traffic signs.
- Not maintain range control or appropriate speed.
Conditions like seizures, syncope, arrhythmia, sleep apnea, and orthostatic hypotension also have associated symptoms that can threaten safe driving.
Unfortunately, the medications we use to treat these chronic conditions can also have a negative impact. In case control studies, medication classes with increased risk of a crash included:
- Benzodiazepines
- Anticholinergic drugs
- Anticonvulsants
- Antipsychotics
Polypharmacy is also a growing concern for the aging population, as it can lead to drowsiness.
Strategies to address “fitness to drive”
Despite the obvious risks, there are currently NO validated criterion standard measures to determine driver safety.
Still, primary care physicians can take several steps to assess fitness to drive:
- Encourage family members to accompany the older driver when appropriate so they can identify potentially unsafe behaviors.
- Reduce distractions (e.g., by turning off cell phones).
- Investigate and correct reversible causes of driving impairment:
a. Eliminate sedating medications.
b. Treat sleep apnea.
c. Refer to cataract surgery.
In ambiguous cases, physicians can refer patients to a comprehensive driving test administered by an occupational therapist or driving instructor. (Note that Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance typically do not cover evaluations purely to assess driving ability.)
Driving simulators can be used by OT professionals to test performance skills that may not be safely replicable on the road (e.g., the driver’s response to a pedestrian walking into traffic).
Another option is to use a GPS tracker to assess real-life driving behaviors. Hypothetically, this naturalistic driving data could be used to facilitate risk modeling.
Driving cessation and duty to warn
Driving cessation discussions should be conducted with sensitivity—and with family support, if available. Considerations should be made for alternative transportation.
Please note that as a clinician, you may have an ethical “duty to warn” your state licensing agencies of potentially unsafe drivers who refuse to stop driving. Some states provide civil immunity for clinicians who report unsafe drivers, while others have mandatory reporting laws.
(I found this article in JAMA a helpful read on reporting requirements for medically impaired drivers. The 6 states with mandatory reporting laws are: California, Delaware, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, and Pennsylvania.)
New driving safety technologies
90% of all vehicle crashes are due to human error.
Many new technologies are being deployed to help make driving safer. Two trends highlighted in the article are advanced driver assistance systems and autonomous vehicle technology.
Advanced driver assistance systems
These advanced systems are designed to help detect crash risk stimuli and reduce driver error. Some systems will engage the brake when a significant risk is detected.
But, despite the promise of these systems, there is a lack of standardization—and no comprehensive studies have been conducted to prove their effectiveness.
Autonomous vehicles
The Society of Automotive Engineers provides this helpful taxonomy of driving automation:
Contemporary manufacturers of autonomous vehicles are only at level 2. And, automotive engineers predict that vehicles will remain heavily dependent on human interaction for many years to come.
The industry still needs to:
- Reduce costs.
- Refine decision-making AI algorithms.
- Conduct extensive testing.
- Improve reliability in inclement weather.
- Ensure security systems are tamper-proof.
- Work with federal driving regulations.
Conclusion
While technology holds promise in helping older drivers, the reality is that it cannot replace human driving skills—and cannot independently determine crash risk and safety.
At this point, clinicians seeking to determine an individual’s fitness to drive are best served by objective data from technologies coupled with clinical assessment.
Review %open%
After earning your certificate, please consider taking a moment to answer the following three questions:
1.) On a scale of 1-5 please indicate the degree to which the learning objectives were met.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
2.) Please rate our instructors on a scale of 1-5.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
3.) On a scale of 1-5, please rate the learning environment of the Club.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5